The Biblical Serpent is a Bad Egg and So Are His People

What follows four or so paragraphs below is a letter I just wrote to my ex-wife, a secret member of a society the Bible refers to as Babylon (lions, pride). Their religion is astrology and this note describes the mechanism of how they use it as a weapon of mass destruction. This note describes how the cult worships the golden calf - astrology - and how it's used to manipulate time, destroy the gifts God gives us by delaying their development and use, and destroys God's children who are replaced with the line of Cain, who see themselves as gods. But will go into greater Biblical detail in another blog post, as the Bible is full of stories that relate these people to their approach to life and desire to use and destroy Bible people.

The only reason I know is because I'm living it. I've been studying astrology for a long time, to try to see if it's real. But also have been seeing the Bible stories come to life. That so many Bible (OT) stories show this Babylonian cult in action has helped me see the fine detail and finally understand that by creating marriages and children based on prime dates/times that leverage the serpent in the chart, they give birth to their success and their victims detriment and death. This is imho the method that Cain used to kill Abel, steal his inventions, and generate the line of monsters who God had to eliminate by flood.

There's a little more Biblical detail in the note, but will write a more detailed post that shows even more about how they are, and have been, robbing and killing people to eliminate the Bible and create their own line of people - they are in opposition to God, thinking they are some kind of gods on their own (they eat of the tree of knowledge of good and evil and think that's how they become gods, when God asks us to walk in His ways and honor his book so we can live in the image of God.)

The basis of their world is the serpent. They parasitize another's life, destroy them, take everything they own or have created/invented, and destroy the victim's bloodline and heritage. My ex-wife's father is Donald Trump, who embedded her in an Italian family in Queen's, who may be mafia because my ex did something to place me under a person whom I only recently learned was real-deal, hard-core mafia. I realized she was Trump's daughter in May of this year.

My ex created a son with Barrack Obama, and played him off as my son, though I learned recently he wasn't my son - for myriad and obvious reasons, and that led me through the logic in his astrology chart and how he was created to generate a chart which was timed / designed to destroy me in such a subtle way, it took a lot of study to see the detail. But wow, is it real and they've kept everybody in the dark about the power of astrology for a long time. The reality is, this is why the Bible says for us to avoid using astrology for anything more than temporal psychology, to help us understand behavior patterns, not our fate.

Here's where the note starts...

In Genesis 3, the Serpent does some talking to a woman, and she in turn feeds a man. Seems it's a direct reference to our current situation. Allow me to 'splain, Lucy.

Seems somebody in your past learned a little astrology and managed to do a little experimenting with it. They found it worked surprisingly well and created a whole religion/cult around it with the focus on making a family that erases all the weak, Biblical ones, while . Your people are all about your bloodline, but you're also about the Serpent. But what's the serpent and what does it have to do with bloodlines and astrology. It's all kind of a fractal arrangement that allows all the lines to be blurred and the players to be hidden.

There are two lines, the male line and the female line. The goal of each is to propagate the bloodline in secret, while acquiring the wealth and valuables of victims, while destroying them publically and personally, to death

The female line targets victims. The marriage date is significant as the chart has to favor her over the victim. When the time is right astrologically, the woman has a child by one of her cult members who bears a strong resemblance to the victim. The woman makes sure to get pregnant prior to having sex with the victim, but is sure to have sex with the victim so they think the child is theirs. The child's birth date is planned, based on a target/pre-determined astrological configuration. The real father's Sun is placed, with Rahu, in the 12th house of the child's chart, so as to be associated with the house of isolation, prison, asylums and aligned in opposition to the victim's planet and Ketu, seven houses away. The victim's planet is placed in the house of enemies, so they are born into a role that makes them automatically antagonistic to the child and destined for poverty and isolation.

Rahu is about aggregation, ego, selfish acquisition of things, and an erroneous belief in their omniscience/omnipotence. Both the nodes eclipse any planet they are conjunct with (western astrology), or share a house with (Vedic astrology), in the chart. With Rahu/north node the real father is both powerful and hidden both in the chart and in real life, Unless an astrologer viewing a child's chart (rare in this day and age) is keen to subtle relationships, the victim will be viewed as the sun and real father in their fake child's chart. Nobody but the most aware, detective astrologers would ever notice that the child has two fathers in the chart.

In contrast to Rahu, Ketu is associated with poverty, spirituality, and feelings. So with Ketu/south node, the victim is weak and hidden in the chart and in real life. The child feels undue, damaging pressure from the fake father, manifest as feelings of inadequacy, deflated confidence, or even perception of being abused by the fake father/victim. This is by design as it gives leverage to the mother to build a case that allows for the child to be separated from the victim/fake father due to his damaging influence on the child the world perceives as his own.

Ketu is represented by Sage Durvasa. He acts on feelings, is poor, and wanders, perfect behavior to saddle a victim with when you want to destroy them. Plus, his behavior fits your grift, as he's short-tempered. Seems your ancestors learned that by timing your child's birth such that the planet associated with their fake parent is in the sixth house and conjunct/same house as Ketu, they not only become enemies to the child, they become short-tempered enemies. Best, nobody notices they're not the parent, so in any chart analysis, they're associated with the sun. Once born, the mother trains them to become professional victims to the abuse of their fake parent.

The end result is years of projecting various incantations/variations of "his father abuses his child" into anybody's ear who will listen as a case is made for the father's obvious mental illness, infirmity, and disconnect from real life. The end arrives when the victim is pushed into some form of psychiatric situation, where he's murdered by overdose. As the victim came to be viewed as a horrible person to the world, due to his fake child turning him into an enemy, the child's real father being the victims real, but hidden enemy, nobody thinks twice about their demise and death.

What's left is for the child to acquire, legally, possession of all the fake father's assets. This is the result of a fake marriage and a fake child, both timed to ensure the demise of the victim and for the sole purpose of destroying their branch in the tree of life, theft of assets, and more. Possibly even destroying the parent's name by shame due to their being made poor and abused by criminals framing them for crimes they didn't or wouldn't ever commit. But who's going to believe the desperate and destitute when everybody and their mother is saying they need help and have been acting violent and crazy?

The second branch of your cult is the father's line.

The men in your cult seek to populate the world with his seed. They find women who have physical beauty, or strength, or talent, or a family lineage in line with the cult, like your bloodline is royal due to the Trump/Stalin lineage. Then they have them enter into a secret and binding agreement, a non-disclosure agreement, that assures the woman will be loyal to the proposition, maintaining her silence for life about the relationship established by the man of your cult and herself. She will sire children that will be birthed at times according to the cult's demands. Her children will be raised by the cult from birth. They will be indoctrinated in the ways of the cult, which is that outsiders are essentially victims or slaves eligible to be targeted and hunted.  Boys will be given tools to become leaders. Another cult member may have acquired inventions that a new member may be given in order to become wealthy and a prominent member of society. The elevation of members gives them cache and public appeal, giving them opportunity to find and enter into binding agreements with individuals who share qualities the cult is looking to propagate in future generations.

Your cult has the goal of creating and managing leaders, who continue populating the world with your line.  It's conceivable that the logical extreme will be a world populated with your breed, a supposed superior brand of person or master race. The most desired target of your cult is people with a strong bond to the Bible as you see the Bible as a hateful book that creates a "chosen people" that isn't yours. You seek to prove there is no God and your people are the chosen race.

The reality is, you're cult is full of deranged people who imagine they have some superior attributes that essentially make y'all gods over the rest of us mere mortal schlubs.  The stone cold truth, the reality is, you, your father Donald J. Trump, and Brody's father, Barrack Obama, are all stone cold criminals.

That this is all spelled out in the Bible just makes it all that much better. Genesis 3 shows you taking orders from the serpent, which means your father, and Barrack, and the actual serpent of the chart, and the serpent of the belly, which you seem to elevate to something cool. That's all Rahu energy for you, to ensure your child and cult gain, while the man loses and, Biblically, eats of what you've given him: Ketu - poverty, slander, death. You don't recite the biblical prohibition about eating from the tree of knowledge of good and evil correctly because, like Cain, you don't believe in God. At all.  There's so much detail this story connects to, especially Gen 3 (above) and Gen 4, where Cain kills Abel, who is married to a member of Cain's cult, evidenced by Lamech's giving Abel's inventions to his children, descendants of Cain, of two mothers, a show mother and a hidden mother. You're the Nephilim and the reason for the flood, which is about to really happen because while you've been out breeding like show ponies, you've ignored the health of the gardens and flocks of our planet while literally raping everything and everybody. Nice job, asshole(s).

What I've described with respect to chart configuration is a bare minimum construct. I haven't analyzed beyond the real father in the 12th, fake in the 6th, and the chart being configured to ensure the main houses, 1st, 4th, 7th, 10th, of self, home, partnerships, and career are damaged with regards to the enemy - the fake father, in the sixth house and to ensure they ultimately end up getting sucked into the 12th house: prison or psychiatric ward, to meet their death at the hands of a paid murderer, but especially due to the victim's ignominy.

But this highlights how your cult, Babylon, operates and has operated for some thousands of years. It's really well-detailed in the Books of Daniel and Esther, too, though Saul/Rome/Babylon hunting David/Israel to the death, and Esau/Jacob also highlight the relations. All you need is the birth-time of everybody in your society, and you can chart their course through your little soap opera and to your benefit, from cradle to the grave and without anybody knowing their life is being managed by you and your sociopaths as you ensure nobody even studies astrology, because it's stupid superstition. Some scam you got going. I hope this letter punches a hole in your metaphorical ocean liner that causes it to sink. The world won't survive you. I told you that you were bad at math and here you are bad at prioritizing, too. You brought Brody into the world to be your tool and have all but guaranteed he won't even have a life because of your utter ignorance.

Turn yourself in.

Coming Soon: Bible Stuff Writings & Presentations For You

I need to take stock of books of the Bible I've been studying and have reason to share a little of what I've learned from them.  What I've learned is different than what I've found from sources.  What I've seen is pretty cool.  I've laughed at a number of the insights, they're pretty awesome.  I'm looking forward to doing some presentations.  Will probably start with Daniel and work to some of the other books.

What am I seeing?  Real detail that is timely and meaningful.

Here's a list of the books:

1. Daniel
2. Ezekiel
3. Ruth
4. Esther
5. Genesis
6. Exodus
7. John
8. Job
9. Jonah

I have to listen to Isaiah again. There's a lot there.

Oh, almost forgot these phrases/fragments that I heard, thought about, and suddenly came to life in mind.  I think the interpretations make sense, but am waiting to share them:

1. bread & wine
2. heaven & earth
3. sheep, baa!
4. stoning
5. what Jesus was writing on the ground in John 8

 There's more. Will add labels/contexts/notes as I remember.  Just need to keep track or I forget.  I forget a lot of stuff, but not of the Bible.

Part 2: Correlating Genesis Chapters 1 & 2: Light and Heaven

Introduction

This is the second of a series of articles that attempt to correlate the first two chapters of Genesis. The first article highlighted how the creation of man relates between the two, at minimum in relation to the first clause of Genesis 1:27 pointing to Genesis 2:7 (highlighted below in bold-italic):

27 And God prepareth the man in His image; in the image of God He prepared him, a male and a female He prepared them.
Genesis 1:27 YLT98

7 And Jehovah God formeth the man--dust from the ground, and breatheth into his nostrils breath of life, and the man becometh a living creature.
Genesis 2:7 YLT98

This article will attempt to highlight how the first 2 days of creation of Genesis 1 are similarly present in chapter 2 and that they directly correlate to each other.

Chapter 1, First Two Days of Creation

The first day of creation is described in Genesis 1:2-5. In it, God creates light.

The second day of creation sees the creation of heaven in Genesis 1:6-8.

Chapter 2, First Verses

In chapter two, there's no explicit mention of either light or heaven having been created. The chapter opens with verses about Shabbat/Sabbath, day of rest, described in Genesis 2:1-3:

1 And the heavens and the earth are completed, and all their host;

2 and God completeth by the seventh day His work which He hath made, and ceaseth by the seventh day from all His work which He hath made.

3 And God blesseth the seventh day, and sanctifieth it, for in it He hath ceased from all His work which God had prepared for making.

Correlating Days 1 & 2

It is this author's convention that the first six days of creation describe God's work week, a template for how things are created, and ultimately viewed as very good. Further, the second week highlights how chapter 2 maps directly to chapter 1, providing clear guidance from God to man about how man is to be: created in the image of God and likeness, tending to God's creation.

Chapter one opens with the first two days seeing the creation of light and heaven. Chapter two opens with the Sabbath, then immediately jumps to the beginning of a day in which Earth and Seas are present, a clear correlation to Day 3 of chapter one.

For the creation sequence to map one-to-one, Genesis 2 has to therefore open with light and heaven.

Genesis 2: Creating Light and Heaven

The opening of the Sabbath; the lighting of candles, is the weekly act that maps Genesis 2 to the creation of light of Genesis 1. The first day of creation thus maps to the start of Sabbath.

The Sabbath continues as a reflection of heaven on earth, filled with the light of life. While the opening of the Sabbath creates light, the entire day is, like heaven, blessed and sanctified by God when man (male and female) lives in the image and likeness of God. The Sabbath is a day of family, feast, community, and study of God's word without worry of work, because all the work has been done.

For man, there is no other way to create heaven on earth outside of following God's word. By lighting candles and honoring the Sabbath, man weekly creates light and heaven on earth. In this way, the Sabbath of Genesis chapter 2 maps directly to the first two days of creation in Genesis chapter 1.

Bible: If Genesis 1:26-31 Is Contract? Here's One Way To Validate It

Introduction

In a prior article, I attempted to show how Genesis 1:26 is the law to which the rest of the Bible directly relates. In the article, I used a simple example to show how the first clause of Gen 1:26 was supported by the succeeding verse, Gen 1:27, and the first clause of Gen 1:27 was then shown to be supported by Gen 2:7.

In all cases, the language of each verse provided guidance and connective support to show that the verses were all directly related. While more examples will hopefully follow, should the concept find validity and acceptance, further proof will likely be found by others as well.

This article will attempt to highlight how the verses of Genesis 1:26-30 define not only the law (Gen 1:26), but a contract that God has made with man. Not only do the verses represent a contract, they show how we can validate our performance against the contract.

What this article doesn't do is attempt to obviate commandments. The first commandment is viewed as "be fruitful and multiply". I would argue, that while it's the first sequential commandment, this article shows what I feel are the first temporal commandments.

By ignoring the garden, we ignore health. By ignoring health we allow disease to spread, oftentimes undetected.

What we create by ignoring the garden is Genesis chapter 4, but that article is on the list to be written. I will argue that we can't grow the garden of our higher mind without knowing how to tend and eat from the garden on earth.

I've kept this article on the light side to highlight the concept and constructs. Greater detail will hopefully follow in subsequent work.

The Contract

First, all the verses are listed for reference:

26 And God said, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness, and they shall rule over the fish of the sea and over the fowl of the heaven and over the animals and over all the earth and over all the creeping things that creep upon the earth."

27 And God created man in His image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.

28 And God blessed them, and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and rule over the fish of the sea and over the fowl of the sky and over all the beasts that tread upon the earth. "

29 And God said, "Behold, I have given you every seed bearing herb, which is upon the surface of the entire earth, and every tree that has seed bearing fruit; it will be yours for food.

30 And to all the beasts of the earth and to all the fowl of the heavens, and to everything that moves upon the earth, in which there is a living spirit, every green herb to eat," and it was so.

31 And God saw all that He had made, and behold it was very good, and it was evening and it was morning, the sixth day.

Sequencing Our Actions

In the natural course of things, we take the list above, read it top to bottom and treat it like a to-do list. In this case, we go all in for fruitful and multiply, get busy with all the details of family, and spend the rest of our lives trying to find time for the rest.

Mostly we skip ahead to other parts of the book and wrestle with logic, look for inspiration or guidance, try to find proof in the real world for catastrophes, and locate sites mentioned in verse.

While reading this contract top to bottom may seem natural, educational, and meaningful, it's simply not enough. If Gen 1:26 provides the law that provides the overarching theme to the book, we have to actively make the right associations to the right parts in the right order.

Unfortunately, and without guidance, we'll likely be lost somewhere along the way. Confusion has been known to be a source of conflict.

Fortunately, the validation of our performance to the contract appears to be quite simple.

Stand Here, Look There

If we stand on Genesis 1:31, look back on creation, and take the contract in reverse order, it appears we can know when we've performed in accordance with all of the terms of the contract. Let's give it a try.

31 And God saw all that He had made, and behold it was very good, and it was evening and it was morning, the sixth day.

If we are made in the image of God, we can stand and look just as God does in Gen 1:31: back at the entirety of His creation. What's the first thing we see?

First, Feed God's Creatures

30 And to all the beasts of the earth and to all the fowl of the heavens, and to everything that moves upon the earth, in which there is a living spirit, every green herb to eat," and it was so.

Man alone is capable of knowing how to feed and heal all life forms listed in Gen 1:30. Man alone is the only creature on earth capable of actively tending all aspects of the the garden of the earth so all life specified in Gen 1:30 have food to eat. The detail required of performing this clause alone is staggering in complexity.

If this is indeed a first step, is there biblical support for this step being a first requirement? My argument is Genesis chapter 2 presents and expands on the sequence with greater detail. From learning how to care for the elements, to understanding how to tend the garden, to naming all the animals, the second chapter of the Bible clearly sequences, expands on, and supports a high-level perspective of Genesis 1:30.

In the interest of brevity, and to keep the proof of concept focused, I'll skip enumerating all the possibilities and responsibilities associated with performing this clause to satisfaction.

If this is a contract, we can advance to the next requirement once we can validate this clause and in such a way that when God stands and looks, He approves of the efforts of man.

Feed Man

29 And God said, "Behold, I have given you every seed bearing herb, which is upon the surface of the entire earth, and every tree that has seed bearing fruit; it will be yours for food.

After we've learned to feed all the life forms listed in Gen 1:30, we next have to learn to eat and feed man. Without knowing how to use plants, and eat for all parts of our body, our health will fail in some aspect and our mind may suffer.

Each and every plant we eat has ecosystems, seasons, requirements, enemies, invaders, parts, modes of preparation, and so much more, man could be stuck on this step for a while. Learning how to apply plants as medicines increase the complexity.

We have to know how to tend the garden of earth to know how and when to use plants; for food and as medicine, for the health of man upon the planet. It has to be provable such that when God stands to validate our work, He finds it to be very good.

Blessings of Family and Generations

28 And God blessed them, and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and rule over the fish of the sea and over the fowl of the sky and over all the beasts that tread upon the earth. "

Once we know how to feed life, we reap the benefits of being able to make, care for, and guide healthy and abundant family. We know how to tend all the earth and we pass the knowledge, wisdom, work ethic, and purpose to our children. We also enjoy longer, healthier lives, which enable us to pass and share wisdom through many generations.

With Wisdom Comes Understanding

27 And God created man in His image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.

Once have performed the previous three clauses? We apparently understand what it means to be made in the image of God. We understand all scripture associated with all that has come before, how to be healthy, get along with one another, heal, care for, feed, be compassionate towards, timely, merciful, understanding; honoring God's commandments, and all God teaches us.

Better Understanding of the Law

26 And God said, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness, and they shall rule over the fish of the sea and over the fowl of the heaven and over the animals and over all the earth and over all the creeping things that creep upon the earth."

It isn't often one can read a contract in both directions and have it provide better understanding of the law. In this case, doing so may provide greater means for understanding the word of God and the role man plays upon the earth in accordance with the purpose for which God has made man.

If this concept holds true, it represents a staggering level of detail and work to take on. It's hard to see how life can survive without man being involved in the active management of everything directly related to life. In the end, we not only have to know the steps of the contract and how to fulfill them, we have to know all supporting scripture that follows as well as every aspect of God's creation that came before. The entire book is our guide to healthy living, in and for all times and seasons. 

Bible: The Law Begins With Genesis 1:26

Introduction

The Bible contains numerous references to "The Law and the Prophets". The Law is often considered from regions deep and progressively deeper into Torah/Tanahk/Bible. It therefore may come as a surprise to discover The Law quite possibly exists and starts right at the beginning, in Genesis 1:26.

In the beginning, God presents a very concise contract with man, male and female. This article will attempt to highlight the apparent terms of the contract with supporting detail.

This article is but a short introduction that will hopefully highlight the basics of the law, with supporting declarations.

For the premise to be reasonable, it would appear that the contract should be found to bind man to God's work of creation. Further, each clause should serve as root category/node for all aspects of the purpose for which God created man in His image and likeness.

The Law: A Brief Beginning

What follows appears to be a, or the, contract defined by God, to be performed by man.

26 And God said, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness, and they shall rule over the fish of the sea and over the fowl of the heaven and over the animals and over all the earth and over all the creeping things that creep upon the earth."

27 And God created man in His image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.

28 And God blessed them, and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and rule over the fish of the sea and over the fowl of the sky and over all the beasts that tread upon the earth. "

29 And God said, "Behold, I have given you every seed bearing herb, which is upon the surface of the entire earth, and every tree that has seed bearing fruit; it will be yours for food.

30 And to all the beasts of the earth and to all the fowl of the heavens, and to everything that moves upon the earth, in which there is a living spirit, every green herb to eat," and it was so.

31 And God saw all that He had made, and behold it was very good, and it was evening and it was morning, the sixth day.

Connecting the Dots

Genesis 1:26 is the declaration of the law. It defines who is being created, in terms that are clearly elaborated.

While Genesis 1:26 declares the law, it is too terse and devoid of detail for any and all readers to clearly understand and follow. For this reason, and as in the laws of man, elements of the verse will be found to relate to subsequent and supporting clauses/scripture.

For example, the first declaration of Genesis 1:26 appears to find support in the immediately subsequent verse, Genesis 1:27, in its entirety:

The first clause of Genesis 1:26 is:

1:26(1) "Let us make man in our image"

The wording of Genesis 1:26(1) is contained, and therefore, directly related to Genesis 1:27 in its entirety:

1:27 And God created man in His image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.

While Genesis 1:27 is supported by Genesis 1:27, it contains multiple clauses and lacks detail required for any and all to completely understand.  Furthe support of Genesis 1;27 will be found to be supported further within the text.

The first term enumerated in 1:27, "And God created man in His image" is directly supported, and expanded on, and by the same terms used on 1:26 and 1:27, by Genesis 2:7 (see my earlier article for further detail). The text of Genesis 2:7 follows:

7 And the Lord God formed man of dust from the ground, and He breathed into his nostrils the soul of life, and man became a living soul.

Genesis 2:7 provides detail related to scope, context, detail, and purpose in support of prior declarative verse(s). Genesis 2:7 begins to expand on earlier constructs, to assist man in understanding not only what it means to be created, but how to (begin to) perform in accord with the law, as "man in His image".

A Quick Summary

The following table highlights the law of Genesis 1:26, followed by scripture supporting the first clause. As new articles are produced to highlight further connections, the detail and date created will be added here.

26 Let us make man in our image...

1. Genesis 1:26 is the law. All subsequent laws should trace their roots to at least one clause of it.
2. The first clause of Genesis 1:26 is expanded first by Genesis 1:27.
3. The first clause of Genesis 1:27 is supported by Genesis 2:7.
4. The second clause of Genesis 1:27 is supported by Genesis 2:8-20, and Genesis 1:2-10; the first 2 days of creation and the creation of earth and seas of day 3. [Added 9/11/17].

This article is intended to simply be a proof, serving as an introduction to deeper meaning and the very real purpose God states for having created man and the law as it applies to His creation.

Enter Neurology (A Brief Detour)

Neurology is about brains. When we learn, we grow brains. The growth of knowledge in our brains looks similar to stuff that grows in real life. Brains and real things are so similar in appearance and function, that brain growth structures are often called real-life things, like trees and such.

The interconnectedness of biblical scripture appears to also be described in similar, real-life stuff, and neurological terms, too. In fact, brain stuff, neurology, looks to be described on day three of creation:

11And God said, "Let the earth sprout vegetation, seed yielding herbs and fruit trees producing fruit according to its kind in which its seed is found, on the earth," and it was so.

Connecting scriptural verse, as is here being presented by the law and supporting scripture, is quite similar to growing grass, neural connections/interconnectivity, in the mind. God uses an economy of expression in His Book to ensure scripture can be applied in and to myriad contexts. Using plants to describe plants in a garden appears now to relate to both plants upon earth and within the mind.

What this appears to mean is that God knows we're growing neurology by reading scripture. It also suggests God is referring to at least two earths in scripture. The first earth, the planet, and the second, the mind.

If scripture applies to earth/planet and earth/mind, it would further suggest the creation of at least two (2) gardens, one on earth, and one in the mind.

Both earth and garden, outside and inside the mind, appear to share the same legal requirements: that man has been created to tend them to ensure the health of each, and all. It should be clear, if true, that scripture, as written, applies to each earth and garden without modification (a statistically significant statement and one that, if true, is simply awesome with regards to implementation detail.)

Conclusion

This article has attempted to serve as an introduction to God's Law described in Genesis chapter one, verses 26-31. Verse 26 declares the law as it applies to man. In the interest of brevity, verse 26 has been shown to be supported by all of verse 27, by position and terms used.

In order to show that scripture beyond the verses in chapter one provide further support of the law, a link between verse 1:27, the first part, has been made to Genesis 2:7, in which man is expressly created in the same terminology as 1:26 and 1:27.

A brief detour has been taken into neurology, the study of the mind. I've attempted to highlight how scripture refers to earth as, at minimum, two distinct entities: the planet and the mind. Is true, It logically follows that each earth grows a garden that man alone is responsible for tending forever and ever, amen.

Subsequent articles will attempt (to continue) to shed light on the interconnected nature of scripture and as it applies to the law described in Genesis chapter one. Though my sincere hope is that, if true, one can begin to explore further the awesome nature of God through His law and prophets.

Bible: Naked, A Possible Meaning (Clean: Brains)

Introduction

In a previous article, I touched on how reading the black fire letters of Torah (the characters of Biblical Hebrew) become white fire - neural connections - in the higher mind as they are read. The process appears to be described or introduced by the sequence of the creation of light on day 1.

What this appears to suggest is that the letters, words, and verses of Torah/Tanahk are specifically designed to be ingested, processed, and associated with the higher mind.

If the concept of God's word illuminating the higher mind were to be considered true, it would seem that further examples could and would be found on the text. It seems that one of the first examples exists in the story of Adam and Eve.

Naked is to Darkness, As Clothed is to Light

And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.

Genesis 2:25 KJV

It isn't immediately obvious how naked has any relationship to anything other than being unclothed and/or indescrete and not caring. A key to understanding how darkness and naked are related starts with the definition of ashamed:

Here's the @MerriamWebster definition of 'ashamed':

Definition of ashamed

1. 1a :  feeling shame, guilt, or disgrace She felt ashamed for hitting her brother. You should be ashamed of yourself. Losing is nothing to beashamed of. He was deeply ashamedof his behavior.b :  feeling inferior or unworthy
2. 2:  reluctant or unwilling to do something because of shame or embarrassment I was ashamed to be seen with him. I'm not ashamed to admit that I don't know the answer.
3. Feeling unashamed means being willing to do embarrassing things without the feeling of guilt or disgrace. It can also mean acting without conscience. What's a good example of doing an embarrasing thing without guilt? How about when a dog jumps somebody's leg? The dog doesn't care about how it looks, it's following its nature and doing what it feels without any awareness of shame.

While using a dog to highlight "not ashamed" may seem harsh or unrelated to the biblical verse of Genesis 2:25, it appears to be precisely what the verse is highlighting.

The Frontal Lobe of the Brain and Behavior

The following excerpt is from "The Centre for Neuro Skills"

The frontal lobes are involved in motor function, problem solving, spontaneity, memory, language, initiation, judgement, impulse control, and social and sexual behavior.

If the frontal lobes are related to what can be considered higher or executive functions, like judgment, what part or parts of the brain are working when the frontal lobe isn't? 

Enter: The Triune Brain

The Triune Brain is a model composed of three component parts. The frontal lobe, mentioned above is related to the newest elements of brain evolution, called the Neomammilian Complex.

The two lower brain component parts are the Reptilian Complex and the Paleomammilian Complex.

The Reptillian Complex

From Wikipedia:

The reptilian complex, also known as the R-complex or "reptilian brain" was the name MacLean gave to the basal ganglia, structures derived from the floor of the forebrain during development. The term derives from the idea that comparative neuroanatomists once believed that the forebrains of reptiles and birds were dominated by these structures. MacLean proposed that the reptilian complex was responsible for species-typical instinctual behaviors involved in aggression, dominance, territoriality, and ritual displays.

The Paleomammilian Complex

From Wikipedia:

The paleomammalian brain consists of the septum, amygdalae, hypothalamus, hippocampal complex, and cingulate cortex. MacLean first introduced the term "limbic system" to refer to this set of interconnected brain structures in a paper in 1952. MacLean's recognition of the limbic system as a major functional system in the brain was widely accepted among neuroscientists, and is generally regarded as his most important contribution to the field. MacLean maintained that the structures of the limbic system arose early in mammalian evolution (hence "paleomammalian") and were responsible for the motivation and emotion involved in feeding, reproductive behavior, and parental behavior.

Why all the brain talk? The two lower components of the Triune Brain are covered by the yarmulke. The detail from the Reptillian Complex and the Paleomamillian Complex describe actions and activities related to animal or primal behavior. Like in our excitable dog example. The yarmulke is Gods way of saying, "I'm right above you." It also covers the component parts of the lower, or primal, mind. As all aspects of the word of God are intended to create wisdom:

The Lord by wisdom hath founded the earth; by understanding hath he established the heavens.

Proverbs 3:19 KJV

The Yarmulke is Gods way of blocking out the light from the animal parts of our brain.

Letting the Light In

So if Adam and Eve are naked and not ashamed, then they're acting out of their lower mind without an awareness of their being any need to feel shame or guilt regarding their actions. What's the proof that God knows all this advanced brain stuff?

And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.

Genesis 3:7 KJV

What happens when your eyes are open? They let the light in. Where does the light of wisdom live? According to this author, the light of wisdom lives where God can see it, In the higher mind, beyond the bounds of the yarmulke. But God explains it at the end of the story where God remedies their nakedness:

Unto Adam also and to his wife did the Lord God make coats of skins, and clothed them.
Genesis 3:21 KJV

How do we know that Adam and Eve come to understand the connection between their actions and higher concepts like judgment (their own as well as that of God)?

And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself.

Genesis 3:10 KJV

Fear and guilt are suddenly guiding the first couple to an awareness of having done something shameful. In this case, naked, not ashamed, and darkness all get associated when God asks:

And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?

Genesis 3:11 KJV

Because naked is directly related to eating of the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

In the end, naked can not only mean literally naked, the breadth and depth of the ways we can act naked far exceeds simply being indescreet regarding clothing. Naked extends to how we look, act, speak, and behave in ways that mimic animal behavior and without conscience, generally in search of immediate gratification.

The only way we are able to rise above primal or animal behavior, like Adam and Eve, is by active development of our higher mind. Curiously, while growing the higher mind sounds appealing, burning all that fire and neurons and neural trees into the mind via study and repetition has been known to cause brain pain and mental anguish. There doesn't seem to be any other choice.

Bible: Genesis 1: Where and How Hebrew Letters, Black Fire, Becomes White Fire

Hypothesis & Introduction

The Hebrew letters of the Bible are known as black fire.  When taken into the mind they create neural connections, which can be described as white fire.

The first day of creation appears to show how the letters we read become light in the mind and how God sees the light as it is created.

This appears to first suggest the neural connections are created in the cerebral hemisphere/frontal lobe (higher mind), beyond the bounds of the yarmulke. The light that is created "covers" or "clothes" the individual in day (light) as opposed to being covered by darkness or night.

Genesis 1:1-5:

1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.

4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.

5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
Genesis 1:1‭-‬5 KJV

Support

What is happening? Two things. First, God is sharing details regarding the creation of light in the universe. The second thing that is happening, is the brain is taking in the letters, words, and phrases of the story, processing them, and, at minimum:

• Burning the letters, words, and phrases into the mind sequentially
• Ordering creation temporally
• Attempting to place objects spatially
• Attempting to process God's words aurally
• Attempting to understand constructs, like what a void is.

There's much more going on, but the points listed highlight some of the main activities related to taking the elements of the story into the mind.

Where the Words Live

With regards to how the letters, words, and phrases are processed, the text is here showing that they are not associated with the lower, primal, mind. They can't be, because the primal mind deals with primal things like food, desires/wants, ego and feeling.

By opening the book written by God, the mind similarly opens the region related to higher authority, wisdom, and time, which all pass through lower centers and into the temporal and cerebral lobes of the brain.

Each logical segment is a temporal segment of a logical sequence comprising a complete expression. We logically follow the path and wonder, by asking questions. Like, what does it all mean? What is light? What do the stages leading up to the creation of light mean?

The lower mind wants. It is desire and need driven. It pursues, it hunts, it possesses. It doesn't know time outside of the moment. The higher mind wonders, questions, researches, learns and knows. It organizes and plans according to time.

The opening of Genesis describes the creation of light. Taken as a roadmap of the result of reading, it shows light being created in the mind, and therefore, how the mind eats.

The first time the story is read, there isn't any construct related to the story in the mind: where the constructs will live in the mind is void.

As there are no neural connections burned into the mind related to the story, there is darkness on the face of the deep: way up high in the mind, where the word of God lives, it's dark. This could also mean that the mind is not yet in possession of neural connections that join the mind to the deep of the heart.

The spirit of God hovers over the waters: of the mind, where the neural connections will be formed for each letter of fire. How do they get burned, by what mechanisms, and how do they know where to go?

Let there be light: neurons are burned, white fire, and all the neural pathways are formed by reading the words of the text.

And God seeth the light: beyond the yarmulke, in the higher brain centers. With all the connections formed from the text that is read, ingested, eaten, bright light is created.

Moshiac, God's Anointed

King Cyrus, King Saul, and King David are God's anointed. When they were anointed, they had olive oil poured upon their heads. [Jesus was God's anointed, but he didn't have oil poured on his head. More on this in a separate article, point is about oil on head.] The oil represents the fuel for the light that they are to become to the people they are to lead. The oil is the symbolic fuel feeding the light of the anointed with God's spirit via His word, in their mind and heart.

Isaiah Calls to Eat of the Word of God

Isaiah 55 opens with:

1 Ho, every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters, and he that hath no money; come ye, buy, and eat; yea, come, buy wine and milk without money and without price.

2 Wherefore do ye spend money for that which is not bread? and your labour for that which satisfieth not? hearken diligently unto me, and eat ye that which is good, and let your soul delight itself in fatness.
Isaiah 55:1‭-‬2 KJV

It costs nothing to eat of God's word, yet nothing is so fulfilling, healthy, or illuminating.

Jesus Says

Jesus answered, “It is written: ‘Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.’ ”
Matthew 4:4 NIV
http://bible.com/111/mat.4.4.NIV

Jesus/Yeshua appears to refer to the word of God as food. If so, the food we eat with our mind appears to create light in our mind that requires being nourished with the food we eat with our mouth.

That both aspects of eating are entwined in the verses of Genesis 1:26-30 appears to further support what Jesus is teaching. This is the second verse in which Jesus speaks in the book of Matthew.

That Jesus would appear to begin with a teaching parallel to the verses highlighted in this article, from the opening of Torah, seems to validate his being the Messiah prophesied of in Daniel.

Bible: Gen 2:17 YLT98 vs KJV & Using Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil

Comparing the difference between translations of Genesis 2:17 for the purpose of understanding if the differences are significant.

Introduction

This article has been prompted by comparing translations of Genesis 2:17. The translations that will be presented and compared are the King James Version (KJV) and the Youngs Literal Translation 98 (YLT98).

While comparing the two translations recently, it became clear there was a subtle but significant distinction between the two. On the surface, the difference appeared negligible; one word of difference.

The YLT98 version introduced the word dying and after a little exploration, it became clear that one word altered the meaning and utility of the verse:

Young's Literal Translation

and of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, thou dost not eat of it, for in the day of thine eating of it-dying thou dost die.  Genesis 2:17, YLT98

King James Version

But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.  Genesis 2:17, KJV

The significant portions to be compared have been italicized for emphasis.

Eating of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil

The difference between the two verses is slight. Both refer to a day and eating, and both end with man dying. However, in the literal translation, the word dying appears to introduce a function.

If one were to sequence the steps of each verse, they might resemble something like this:

KJV: day, eating, die

YLT98: day, eating, dying, die

The extra step, of dying, in the literal translation suggests that a physical/temporal process of dying begins when one eats from the tree of knowledge of good and evil and terminates with death because of dying:

Dying, adjective, gradually ceasing to exist.

The literal verse shows a complete progression from the action taken at an interval of time, transitioning through a change over time, resulting in death.

The removal of the dying step in the KJV introduces a temporal ambiguity in the logic that says when one eats of the tree of knowledge of good and evil they will die. When? It appears to be up to the reader.

The problem with the KJV logic is that it suggests the death is going to happen at an indeterminate time. As one of the most critical verses in scripture, the omission will be shown to be unfortunate.

What the literal translation shows is that on a day when one eats of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, a process of dying starts that at some point will cause man to die.

The literal translation appears to make the text accessible to any reader, because the process applies to them. Instead of wondering what cause will create the effect and when (or if at all), as in th KJV version, the reader can gain the understanding that eating something unhealthy will hurt them until either they stop doing it, or they die.

If that was all there was to this comparison, it might represent nothing more than a linguistic variance between translations. In the next section, the YLT98 version of Genesis 2:17 will be used to show how it can be used as a template that allows one to explore how a food eaten might contribute to the process of dying that can lead to death.

A Structured Test

If the YLT98 translation does introduce a function, it should be possible to set it up and run arguments through it. By using the keywords highlighted above, a template can be created:

• Day
• Eat
• Dying
• Die

The litmus test is to run some logic through both phrases and see how they work. Let's take a quick look at eatimy so we know what we're allowed to eat. Since we're dealing with trees, we need guidance. Let's review the first verse that describes eating from trees, Genesis 1:29:

And God saith, `Lo, I have given to you every herb sowing seed, which [is] upon the face of all the earth, and every tree in which [is] the fruit of a tree sowing seed, to you it is for food;
Genesis 1:29 YLT98
http://bible.com/821/gen.1.29.YLT98

If we're allowed to eat fruit that sows a seed, then we're not allowed to eat fruit of a tree that doesn't sow a seed. What kind of fruit doesn't sow a seed? A parthenocopic fruit, like seedless fig.

 Since there aren't many parthenocopic fruits, let's expand things a little and see if we can get clarity. If we take a knife and cut fruit that sows seeds, the knife will contact them (or we can eventually dig them out - the point is that they're there.) That's a pretty simple test to see if a fruit has seed - to cut it in half.

But there are few parthenocopic fruit and most fruit of real trees have seeds. If this test applies to life, there have to be examples of forbidden fruit. What if we take our knife and start cutting things that are like fruit? Maybe we can see if we're walking down a logically sound path.

Cutting Fruit That Lacks Seeds

What food shares properties of fruit? One of the main components of fruit is sugar. What if, for the sake of example, a food like fruit without seed is forbidden? For the sake of example, a random selection was made, and...

What if we take our knife and cut a piece of cake? We don't come in contact with a seed, right? The cake is still fruit, though one might consider it a fruit of labor, rather than a fruit hanging on a tree. The point is to find logical tests to see if there's something useful in Genesis 2:17.

The test that we have to define (day, eat, dying, die) in expanded form:

1. for in the day
2. of thine eating of it
3. dying
4. thou dost die

Here's a first pass of the (day, eat, dying, die) test for cake:

1. for in the day -> today
2. of thine eating of it -> cake
3. dying -> short term, but also cumulative & degrading to health
   1. feeding opportunistic/parasitic organisms
   2. stressing the pancreas
   3. drying the liver and skin
   4. irritation of GI tract and loss of nutrient uptake
   5. general malaise (headache, nausea, etc.)
   6. agitation/behavioral issues
   7. fatigue
   8. weight gain
   9. skin related issues (acne)
   10. much more
4. thou dost die -> long term
   1. loss of mobility
   2. high blood pressure
   3. decreased energy levels
   4. diabetes
   5. cancer
   6. cirrhosis of the liver (non-alcoholic)
   7. obesity
   8. much more
   9. death

As logical tests go, it looks like a useful start. This looks promising because it shows that we can take fruit and truth test whether we're eating forbidden fruit and how it affects us.

In this case, cake highlights a good first step into a possible interpretation of what fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil may be or look like.

Gradually Ceasing to Exist

The process of dying is a loss of vitality trending towards death. Eating cake, if it is associated with dying, will cause one to continuously die to different aspects of life and health. At some point in the eating of cake over time, the body will lose the ability to fight to stay alive. The effects of the cake can cause a person to die from any one of a number of ailments related to eating it.

A Comparative Test of Logic: KJV

Let's test the KJV of the same scripture. Here's the same test with the text of the KJV:

1. in the day
2. that thou eatest thereof
3. thou shalt surely die

And here's the KJV test of cake:

1. in the day -> today
2. that thou eatest thereof -> cake
3. thou shalt surely die -> when/how/why?
   1. by choking?
   2. by allergy?

Without the word “dying” to highlight the process of what happens over time, we're not able to do anything logical with the same test. It's very rare for someone to die eating a piece of cake by virtue of the effects of the cake.

The fact that an apparent logical fallacy was introduced into the beginning of the Bible is uunfortunate

By virtue of the literal translation anybody can construct their own logical tests to prove or disprove health of some form of fruit.

Without the process being functional and temporal (over time), the verse is rendered functionally meaningless in the KJV.

In contrast, the YLT98 translation provides the required context to turn the verse into a function that takes any forbidden fruit arguments while yielding results. The YLT98 translation of Gen 2:17 becomes a template that directly relates the reader and what they eat to the negative effects over ti

Conclusion

This concludes the comparison between translations of Genesis 2:17. The Youngs Literal Translation 98 and the King James Version are different in that the YLT98 contains the extra word dying.

The addition of dying to the verse appears to turn it into a function. The function is eating, and the inputs to the function are fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. By virtue of the following keywords a progression is shown to take place over time that leads from the moment of eating, through dying and to death:

• Day
• Eating
• Dying
• Die

The YLT98 translation of Gen 2:17 can be used to determine when amd how eating fruit of the forbidden tree can cause one to ultimately die.

In contrast, the KJV translation offers no such test. It simply sughests that upon eating of the tree of knowledge of good and evil one will die, yet offers no time-frame. In the case of the KJV translation, the reader is left to wonder how or when death might take place for having eaten fruit of the forbidden tree.